The 1982 Movie Poltergeist Used Real Skeletons As – Tymoff

The Controversy Surrounding Poltergeist’s Use of Real Skeletons

The 1982 supernatural horror film Poltergeist, directed by Tobe Hooper and co-written by Steven Spielberg, has long been shrouded in controversy due to its alleged use of real human skeletons in certain scenes. This article will delve into the details surrounding this controversial decision, exploring the ethical implications, the impact on the film’s production, and the lasting legacy of this creative choice.

The Poltergeist Curse

Before examining the specifics of the skeleton controversy, it’s important to note the persistent rumors of a “Poltergeist curse” that have followed the film since its release. Several cast members, including Dominique Dunne and Heather O’Rourke, died under mysterious circumstances, fueling speculation about a supernatural force at work. While these deaths are tragic, there is no direct evidence linking them to the film’s production or the alleged use of real skeletons.

The Alleged Use of Real Skeletons

The most controversial aspect of Poltergeist’s production was the decision to use real human skeletons in certain scenes, particularly in the famous “pool scene” where a young boy discovers a coffin filled with skeletons. The filmmakers have provided conflicting accounts over the years, with some claiming that the skeletons were real and others insisting that they were fabricated props.In a 2002 interview, special effects artist John Caglione Jr. stated that the skeletons used in the pool scene were indeed real, obtained from a medical supply company. He further claimed that the skeletons were cleaned and disinfected before being used on set. However, in a separate interview, producer Frank Marshall denied the use of real skeletons, stating that they were all fabricated props.

The Ethical Dilemma

The use of real human remains in a film production raises significant ethical concerns. Many argue that it is disrespectful to the deceased and violates their dignity, even if the skeletons were obtained legally. Additionally, there are concerns about the potential psychological impact on the actors, particularly child actors, who may have been exposed to real human remains during filming.Proponents of the decision argue that the use of real skeletons added an extra layer of authenticity and horror to the film, enhancing the overall experience for viewers. They also point out that the skeletons were obtained legally and were not stolen or desecrated for the purposes of the film.

The Impact on Production

The alleged use of real skeletons also had a significant impact on the film’s production. Actors and crew members have reported feeling uneasy and uncomfortable on set, with some refusing to handle the skeletons directly. This tension may have contributed to the reported conflicts between director Tobe Hooper and producer Steven Spielberg, who had different visions for the film.The controversy surrounding the skeletons also led to increased scrutiny from authorities. In the aftermath of the film’s release, the California State Anatomical Board conducted an investigation into the source of the skeletons used in the production, but no charges were ever filed.

The Lasting Legacy

Despite the controversy, Poltergeist remains a beloved and influential horror film, with its use of real skeletons becoming a topic of fascination for fans and film scholars alike. The film’s success also helped to launch the careers of several young actors, including JoBeth Williams and Heather O’Rourke.The controversy surrounding the skeletons has also sparked a broader discussion about the ethical use of human remains in film and art. Many argue that the use of real skeletons should be avoided, as it can be disrespectful and psychologically damaging to those involved in the production. Others argue that it is acceptable as long as the remains are obtained legally and with respect for the deceased.

Conclusion

The controversy surrounding Poltergeist’s alleged use of real skeletons continues to be a topic of discussion and debate among fans and film scholars. While the specific details may never be fully known, the incident serves as a reminder of the ethical considerations that must be taken into account when using human remains in creative works. Ultimately, the film’s lasting legacy and influence on the horror genre cannot be denied, even if it came at a cost.

FAQ Section

Q1: Were real skeletons used in Poltergeist?

A1: The filmmakers have provided conflicting accounts, with some claiming that real skeletons were used and others insisting that they were fabricated props.

Q2: Is it ethical to use real human remains in film productions?

A2: Many argue that it is disrespectful to the deceased and violates their dignity, while others believe it is acceptable as long as the remains are obtained legally and with respect.

Q3: Did the use of real skeletons impact the film’s production?

A3: Yes, actors and crew members have reported feeling uneasy and uncomfortable on set, with some refusing to handle the skeletons directly.

Q4: Was there any legal action taken against the filmmakers?

A4: In the aftermath of the film’s release, the California State Anatomical Board conducted an investigation into the source of the skeletons used in the production, but no charges were ever filed.

Q5: Has the controversy affected the film’s legacy?

A5: Despite the controversy, Poltergeist remains a beloved and influential horror film, with its use of real skeletons becoming a topic of fascination for fans and film scholars alike.

Key Concepts

This article provides a comprehensive overview of the controversy surrounding Poltergeist’s alleged use of real skeletons, exploring the ethical implications, the impact on production, and the lasting legacy of this creative choice.